It was a Fox News interview. If the person who did the interview came off well they wouldn't have bothered airing it. Hell, if the person they interviewed didn't come off the way they did they wouldn't have bothered interviewing them.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I mean I agree Fox News will pick apart anything that they get, that’s just the nature of the beast. But the whole discussion in the antiwork community was that whoever did the interview needed to be prepared for that and give them as little ammunition as possible, while presenting the beliefs of the antiwork/workreform movement.

Instead, one of the users (a mod I think?) took the interview without further input from the community, had dirty clothes in the background, and was an easy target for the Fox News crowd.

Idk, it was really unfortunate, and the movement had started to gain serious momentum. It could’ve been a lightning in a bottle opportunity, and they fucked it up

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

This is what I'm getting at, though. If the interviewee didn't fit the checklist of stereotypes Fox News was looking for, there wouldn't have been an interview aired. It was a hit piece. Fox News went looking for a way to run a segment discrediting a movement, and found one.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

The real mistake was going in Fox News in the first place. Nobody should do an interview on Fox News ever for any reason.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 25 points 9 months ago

It really is hard to understate how bad the interview was, that's what makes the misgendering even worse, there were so many other things to critique...