Technology

37724 readers

488 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

A new internet is forming (& Meta wants to control it) [21:30] (youtu.be)

submitted 9 months ago by admin@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My favorite part in this video, was the ending:

maston's CEO told me that for now these there basically no plans for native monetization either. As a content creator I of course have to have monetization. I mean, I spent over a month on this video alone and also thousands of Euros on equipment, rent, people editing the videos, etc., etc. And so until the fediverse figures out monetization, you can support my work by watching my stuff over on nebula

...said on a video on YouTube.

Wait a moment, doesn't YouTube have "native monetization"? Wonder why he's not using that... maybe "native monetization" isn't all that great a thing after all? 🧐

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He is using YouTube's monetization...

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only for the blurb/ad for his extra content off-YouTube. If native monetization was so great, why not also upload the other videos to YouTube?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because he's heavily invested in Nebula and believes their system is better for him and other creators in the long term. That doesn't mean he believes YouTube monetization doesn't work at all, just he prefers to keep bonus videos on Nebula to entice users to join.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

That sounds like a "I want to monetize the bonus videos... and I refuse to not monetize the ad too". Good for him while he can pull it off, but IMHO the future lies in using PeerTube for the ads/blurbs, or directly the whole videos along a Patreon or similar, and leave YouTube behind.