Technology

59317 readers

4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

397

Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin (arstechnica.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin::US government tracking the energy implications of booming bitcoin mining in US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Honestly surprised it is that low.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I can't believe its that high, what a fucking big, stupid, dumbdumb thing. So wasteful and for what benefit?

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The argument on the other side of the coin is that renewable electricity is often produced in excess, and when it cannot be stored, mining bitcoin is an effective way to convert that excess electricity into money. Normally, that energy would just be wasted, reducing the efficiency and economic viability of renewable electricity sources.

This argument is sound, but the problem is that it doesn't describe reality. The reality is that Bitcoin miners set up shop wherever electricity is the cheapest and consume inordinate amounts of electricity whether that electricity is in excess or not, and whether that electricity was generated renewably or not.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

First of all I doubt the profits generated from this go towards anything or anyone worthwhile, second, doesn't bitcoin mining cause diminishing returns individually and across the network? Like aren't the problems getting harder and more expensive computationally?

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The mining difficulty adjusts automatically so that 1 block is produced every 10 minutes on average.

More miners join, more difficult and expensive it gets, to the point it forces the least efficient miners to be turned off, or seek cheaper electricity. If too many leave or the price of BTC raises, more people are incentivized to join.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

More miners join, more difficult and expensive it gets, to the point it forces the least efficient miners to be turned off, or seek cheaper electricity.

So wealth continues to be concentrated by the wealthy while polluting a bunch.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

So wealth continues to be concentrated by the wealthy

You know the business is legit, when the only complaint is "BuT ThE RiCh!!"

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

The cops used to find people growing marijuana in winter by the snow thawed on the roofs. Now there would be a mining rig under such a roof (also, most of the time there will be no snow, and then too much snow on occasion)

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Benefit is a better world.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Maybe the larger American owned projects are located in places where energy is cheaper / cooling is easier