this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
184 points (94.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12214 readers
482 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/7460553

A poster in the southern Spanish city of Seville that depicts a young, handsome Jesus wearing only a loincloth has unleashed a storm on social media, with some calling it an affront to the figure of Christ and others posting lewd remarks and memes poking fun at the image.

The poster by internationally recognized Seville artist Salustiano Garcia Cruz shows a fresh-faced Jesus without a crown of thorns, no suffering face and minuscule wounds on the hands and ribcage. It was commissioned and approved by the General Council of Brotherhoods, which organizes the renowned and immensely popular Holy Week processions ahead of Easter in Seville.

As soon as it was unveiled last week criticism of it went viral on social media and a debate erupted over how a resurrected Christ should be depicted. Many called it a disgrace, inappropriate, too pretty, modernist and out of line with Seville’s Easter tradition.

...

In another interview published by El Mundo daily, Garcia responded to criticism from conservative groups that the depiction of Jesus was “effeminate” or “homoerotic.”

“A gay Christ because he looks sweet and is handsome, come on! We are in the 21st century,” Garcia said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The cropped pic in the article is useless; here's a more illustrative one:

[–] rushaction@programming.dev 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My gay ass doesn't see an issue at all with this.

Then again it's religion. And as we are currently experiencing, that is a shit show no matter what.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Straight here; I still don't see how this is considered homoerotic. Is it because you can see the side of his legs? What's next? His ankle will be visible? I'd like to see the people who look at it and say it is inappropriate.

[–] macaroni1556@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thank you I couldn't understand at all the complaint. This makes a bit more sense but honestly still decently tasteful?

A body is a body

[–] dEVbiKub@feddit.nu 12 points 9 months ago

It's one thing finding the image to be erotic, but what confuses me more is how it could be specifically homoerotic. Is that finger thing he's doing a secret homo pick up sign that I don't know about (but presumably conservative christians do...)? Were male christians aroused but not female ones?

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

IDK looks like all the other catholic imagery I saw growing up.

Maybe if you’re upset about stupid sexy Jesus, you have some introspection to do

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

I think the problem is that some men look at hot Jesus and feel... Funny. But they are Christian men... So it MUST be the image that's not just erotic but homo-erotic. It is the image that's giving them a semi, nothing to do with them, at all.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yes, it's very gay.