this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
382 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2529 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(Reuters) - Canada on Sunday announced a two-year extension to a ban on foreign ownership of Canadian housing, saying the step was aimed at addressing worries about Canadians being priced out of housing markets in cities and towns across the country.

Canada is facing a housing affordability crisis, which has been blamed on an increase in migrants and international students, fueling demand for homes just as rising costs have slowed construction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ban amateur landlords.

You want to be a landlord? Better buy a purpose built unit like a triplex or larger that will encourage densification and stop fucking over families just trying to find a place to raise their family.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If both corporate ownership and amateur landlords are banned, then doesn't that severely limit what a landlord can be?

I mean, that might not be a bad idea...

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For single family homes - yes! I'm fine with corporate ownership of purpose built units. We need way more of them, and the idea that "mom and pop" investors would fill that void is silly.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

I don't think the differentiator should be corporate versus "mon and pop" landlords, but rather single family homes versus multi family buildings.

In my view, single family dwellings should generally be owned by the occupant, with very few, very rare exceptions.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago

I don't see the issue