A Boring Dystopia

9788 readers

188 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks@lemmy.world

1453

Poignant post on the state of things (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

355 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Population growth can go too far, can't it?

Last I checked the world seems to be ending around us one day at a time as we march towards an ever higher global temperature, but if you want to say that's normal and fine and we're gonna be ok in 250 years then overpollution from overconsumption isn't a problem yet.

At what point does the earth become overpopulated? are we already there? if not... what's the magic number?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Uh, we are already past resource tipping points as human beings. This means we use more resources than the Earth is producing in a single year, which also means we cut into the resources that have been generated in other plentiful years (like old growth forests, fish populations, etc). If we efficiently utilized the space we have we could raise the bar for that resource tipping point, but we don't.

So yeah. TL;DR: it's not necessarily that we're overpopulated now but our population size + overconsumption = effective overpopulation.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

When I saw in a video that 96% of animals are either human or living for human consumption it was the biggest what the fuck moment of my adult life.

https://ourworldindata.org/biodiversity?insight=wild-mammals-make-up-only-a-few-percent-of-the-world-s-mammals#key-insights-on-biodiversity

[–] fishbone@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

96% of mammals by biomass. Still a what the fuck moment, but a noteworthy difference between that and all animals.

[–] calavera@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

96% of mammals, not animals. So it does not count fish, birds, reptiles, insects and etc...

I mean, it's still a shocking number

PS: ops, someone already replied that... sorry

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

According to Limits to Growth- 2040