169
Taylor Swift Threatens Legal Action Against Social Media Account That Tracks Her Private Jet
(www.billboard.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
169 points (90.8% liked)
Taylor Swift
530 readers
15 users here now
General Taylor Swift discussion. Welcome all Swifties!
Bring your clown hats, your wild theories, and your hype, this community is for you.
Some basic guidelines:
- Posts should be about Taylor Swift
- "Shoehorned" articles about Taylor are considered not relevant.
- Criticism of Taylor is fine, but open trolling or low effort posts like "Her music sux" will be removed.
- Downvote trolling is actively monitored. Downvotes are enabled and welcome, but if all that you do is downvote, it will result in bans. Join the discourse, if you don't like this community feel free to block it. Admins have the ability to see votes by user, and we use that ability here.
- General "Don't be a dick" rules apply, no trolling, no being a jerk
- No NSFW. This is a fun Swiftie community. NSFW is banned here.
- Use the "spoiler" tag generously when it comes to Tour spoilers. Pictures and outfits are fine, but streams/setlists should be marked. (Remember while the US tour is winding down, our global Swifties are just ramping up)
- Add [Spoiler] to your title
- Use the spoiler text for any spoilers in comments/description (the triangle with the exclamation point)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you own a home, in most states, I can find you. Is it wrong for somebody to dox that info?
Would you be upset if I set up an account on twitter saying when you’re home and when you’re not?
We can go a step further, what if I followed you around through the day posting your exact location?
Where is the line drawn when megaphoning public info is too much?
Not on private jets, the locations of which are public. You can keep asking the rest of the questions. The legal answers to which will vary by jurisdiction. But non-military air travel is public information at the aircraft level and nothing you said behind to make the case for changing that.
You totally sidestepped what I asked.
Just because it’s public info, should it be amplified for easy access for all to see?
If you had a stalker, would you want me to tell them when you’re in town and likely at home?
She could just not use a private jet, problem solved.
Living in a house is not the same as being an environmental terrorist.
I thought privacy was paramount?
Do you surrender that just because you’re successful? Sorry, I thought we fought for rights for all, not just the majority, did I miss the memo?
You're not asking relevant questions and the questions you're asking are at best unclear.
What do you mean "should"? I don't believe anyone has a moral imperative to do so under most conditions, but they should retain the right to do so as they do now.
No. I don't think you should be legally barred from it though if you obtained that information legally. Also stalking is already a crime. So what is it you're talking about?
Should you be allowed to post somebody’s location in real time?
I thought it was a pretty straight forward question. I repeated in several ways.
Privacy is supposed to be important, but because it’s the privacy of somebody wealthy, it suddenly doesn’t matter. Seems like a double standard
That's not at issue here.
So the plane tracker doesn’t update in real time?