SneerClub

967 readers

1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems

e/acc has solved the "is-ought" problem with thermodynamics! (twitter.com)

submitted 7 months ago by titotal@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Brain genius Beff Jezos manages to butcher both philosophy and physics at the same time!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sinedpick@awful.systems 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Solving the is-ought problem is super easy when you change what "ought" means.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

P=NP if N=1

[–] self@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago

from the same CS minds who brought you “the solution to the halting problem is trivial, just ask the computer if it halted. hyperturing!”

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 7 points 7 months ago

"This... statement... is... false! (don't think about it don't think about it don't think about it...)"

"Uh, true, I'll go with true."

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 7 months ago

I dislike how often people pull this trick. 'here are 5 definitions of this thing, we are going to pick one, prove something for it, and claim it also holds for all the other definitions, and never tell people we are working with a non-standard thing'. I get that the goal is to make the non-standard definition the standard, it is activism masking as logic, but eurgh.