this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
303 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
306 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was on the beta testing team and have been using Beeper for a little over two years now.

The convenience of having an application to house all of your chat networks is amazing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's reasons people moved away from multi-network apps like Trillian and Gaim/Pidgin... They were always playing catch-up with the official clients, and frequently broke when there were server-side changes. Protocols for proprietary messaging apps were (and still are) undocumented. I'm not convinced they've actually solved any of these issues.

[–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

If Beeper does become a successful business though, there'll be a full time development team "playing catch-up" with money behind them. It's interesting if you read this that they're rolling out features ahead of the message providers in some cases!

They're also leveraging some existing infrastructure. Beeper is built on Matrix which does a lot of the heavy lifting for them.

[–] dan@upvote.au 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

Most of the protocols supported by Trillian were walled gardens too - AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, etc were all proprietary.

I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

Trillian had paid full-time developers too. I'm not sure what'd they'd be doing differently to what Trillian did.

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I think one difference is that the rate of change in chat apps has slowed down dramatically. When was the last time one of the major apps added a new feature you can't live without anymore? So it might be easier now to keep up.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Huh, in my opinion people simply moved away, because the underlying messenger were used less and less. Once everyone ran around with smartphones using WhatsApp, fewer and fewer people cared about MSN, ICQ, etc.

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not "everyone" uses Whatsapp though - I deleted mine after the Cambridge Analytica scandal and I know of a few others who also did so. As far as I know Whatsapp has still never changed their T&C to pass metadata upstream to Facebook.

[–] thesylveranti@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is really region dependent. In Europe (or at least the Netherlands) almost everybody with a smartphone uses Whatsapp

[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Talk to anyone in latin america, you must use whatsapp. There's no avoiding it. Some have tried Telegram a while ago, but most have reverted back to their usual whatsapp or facebook messenger. It's crazy.

[–] NekoRiv@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can vouch for this in a small town of like 5k people in zacatecas, Mexico. Everyone including government and businesses uses WhatsApp. You see the logo with phone numbers all over the place.

[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 3 points 1 year ago

Same experience in Argentina and Paraguay

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I am in a different part of the world, and what you are saying is also true here for the older generation, while the younger one has no escape from Telegram.

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

No, not regionally, as Whatsapp is probably used most. It is more individuals who decided not to use Facebook related products. Luckily, about 90% of my contacts are on Telegram. It's a bit sad that a proprietary product that leaks metadata could be so widely used. If there was going to be a single "one product" I'd rather prefer that to be an open standard protocol. Those protocols exist, but are not in broad use. But the W3C standard for social networking, really needs to also cover chat messengers.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Now? Sure. Back then WhatsApp (before it was bought by Facebook) was replacing SMS nearly everywhere.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 year ago

Once everyone ran around with smartphones using WhatsApp, fewer and fewer people cared about MSN, ICQ, etc.

People moved around, but often still use several apps even today. You might have a "main" app you use with friends (this used to be MSN Messenger for me back in the day; now it's Facebook Messenger), but there may be other people you chat to that use other apps. Facebook Messenger, Whatsapp, Wechat, Viber, Signal, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Skype, Kik... I feel like there's actually more major apps today than there used to be.

[–] AntonAmo@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the behalf of your mentioned problem. I don't know if it still holds as the eu's digital market act now forces "gatekeeper" messaging apps to open their api.

[–] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 2 points 1 year ago

Afaik, that isn't in effect yet, but will become a major factor next year.