210
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Twoafros@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Link to original post: https://mastodon.social/@blogdiva/111932214690841585

Link to news link shown in the photo: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/mozilla-lays-off-60-people-wants-to-build-ai-into-firefox/

Cooperative ownership for all businesses too!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nesola@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The mass won’t even consider being part of a paid membership of a cooperative that’s only purpose is a web browser. That would be the way to drive them even more into Chrome or Safari.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago

i don't think you need to be a paid member to use the finished product. membership is for having a say in what will be changed.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

This has some serious "only landowners should be allowed to vote" vibes

I will say directly that this model of governance is incompatible with the tenets of free software.

[-] abessman@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I will say directly that this model of governance is incompatible with the tenets of free software.

Which of the four freedoms does it fall short of?

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

2, and by extension 3 and 4

Hell depending on what this capital class votes for even 1 might be out the window.

[-] abessman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute, even the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

[-] abessman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute

Why?

the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

Contributing something because you want it is how free software works.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

yes, and having a subscription based shareholder system is antithetical to this

[-] abessman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Repeating it doesn’t make it true. As long as the code is released under a FOSS license, the development model doesn’t matter.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
210 points (89.5% liked)

Work Reform

9437 readers
246 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS