this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

196

17131 readers
32 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] beaxingu@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

its what always happens with a party named after a political philosophy. the politics of the party change but keep using the name. they should just call themself the socialist party already. and maybe later they can change it again to the communist party.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bruh do u even know what communism is? These guys are a centre-centre left party. Waaaaay far from socialist lmao. Had they been as left wing as you're portraying them to be, Canada would've had pharmacare, dental care, socialised higher education, etc. a long time ago.

[–] beaxingu@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bro did you even read what i said. its a liberal party that's not liberal anymore only in name. they are more socialist leaning that has nothing to do with what Canada has or does not have. its like having a socialist party that does not care about the workers anymore or country that is communist but does not have socialized anything and you need to pay before you can even see a doctor. theory is different from practice.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

socialist party that does not care about the workers

Then it is not socialist by definition?

communist but does not have socialized anything

Then it is not communist by definition?

[–] beaxingu@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh no you mean in the real wold political parties do what benefits them. its almost like people don't always do what they proclaim to do.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right... Which is what makes them stop being the thing they claimed to be? And what does this have to do with the liberals being communist? You said they were communist. I explained how they were far from it. You agreed. So we cool?

[–] beaxingu@kbin.run 1 points 1 year ago

i said its a party that is no longer what its name says it is they are far left in almost everything they do they are more like European socialist parties. but you seem to think this will just make them stop to exist when i said from the very beginning they are liberal in name only and that this happens to a lot of political parties over time that are named after a political philosophy. they are bad from both sides they are not liberal for a liberal party and they are not socialist enough to implement the more left wing politics they now actually have. Justin is just very funny he is an empty suit.