this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
725 points (98.9% liked)
Games
32590 readers
1080 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No they don't, and you can totally set up a company without shareholders. LLCs have no shareholders for instance.
I am pretty sure I read article somewhere which said tencent has shares in larian.
Non-voting shares
An LLC or any other corporate structure can have shareholders. It all depends on the structure laid out in the organizing documents. You may have meant private companies don’t have shareholders, but even that isn’t the case.
Can you please share some reference material around this? I would like to read up more about it.
shareholders...owners... who cares about the vernacular. There's always the ownership. An organization of any size is only as good as it's current ownership.
People grow old and eventually die. When ownership passes on from someone who isn't in it for the money to someone who just wants money... even the greatest of organizations can and will fall. I just hope to christ Gabe Newell's successor(s) are in line with his actions.
Turns out, quite a few people when those words are describing very different things.
This is how I know that you don't know much at all. GabeN has changed valve from being a game developer making amazing things like Half Life and Team Fortress 2, to microtransactions and no games. A continuation of what Gabe is doing is pretty much in line with the rest of the industry, except NBA 2k4 would be the last one and it would have microtransaction DLC for the next 15 years.
Valve are major players in Linux being a viable option for gaming and actively fighting the Microsoft monopoly for PC gaming. Not in line with other players in the industry.
They are actively developing proton as well as their own controller support for any games within their platform.
What is the rest of the industry doing in line with this?
Sorry but I agree with the guy on this. It's 2024, idgaf about valve IP anymore, they can ruin their games with microtransactions and I honestly won't care. I use Valve like you and the rest of the world use it: buying and managing a collection of games. And right now, Steam has good practices in that regard. I can get refunds if I play a game for a couple of hours and I don't like it. I can access any of the games I bought, they haven't gone Sony on me and restricted my purchases. They've proven themselves to be good guys in this and I too fear the day GabeN is replaced by some fuck who just wants to get a quick few million, so he shits all over us and our collections of games.
You're simping for a shop. The PC Shop wars have managed to be even more pathetic than the console wars.
I have Steam, Epic Games Store, GoG Galaxy, Battle.net, XBox, Ubisoft and EA's thing installed and they all miraculously work since I'm on PC and it's not a locked down consoles. I get to play games that aren't on steam!
Stop locking your PC down, it's not a console.
Valve is the company responsible for unlocking my PC for gaming. Most games can now be played without using Windows and Valve is mostly responsible for that. Because most game developers do not care and would rather force you to use proprietary OS than let you use what you prefer.
You're still playing proprietary games on your FOSS OS. Furthermore, the vast majority of people don't care.
If it matters to you personally, I get that. But linux gaming is personally DOA for me as it still doesn't support my simracing hardware.
That's only a recent thing and because it benefits them and their handheld device. They introduced online DRM and you are sucking it up.
I have not looked it up but I do recall proton being a thing way before the steam console was.
Okay I looked it up before posting. The deck was released in 2022 and the initial release of proton was on 2018. Steam has had native clients for Linux and native Linux support for dota for ages too.
It's true that their recent big push is because of the handheld but it's also true that they have been pushing for gaming on Linux since way before.
Steam console (not deck specifically) predates any proton release (2015).
Valve has been trying to break from Microsoft for a very long time.
The Deck is the first successful one, but far from the first.
You are absolutely right, I forgot about it. Still, this shows that they have been pushing for popularizing Linux (for their own devices, sure, but in exchange benefiting everybody else) far longer. As any company, avoiding blind trust is advice but they are kinda cool.
In anticipation of their own OS and ecosystem. They are not the saviours of gaming as being professed by so many, they charge 30% to sell there and lock your games under DRM. It's great Linux has become a bit more of a thing but still far from mainstream outside of custom builds like SteamOS.
Their os is based on Linux, every tool they develop and improve can be used in any other Linux systems. I'm not calling them saviours of gaming, I'm happy that they improved the Linux gaming experience by a fuckton for everyone not only the people using their products.
Linux has always been a thing, gaming on Linux is what was not, and steam has always had support for it, I remember playing native Linux dota back in 2015 ish on uni.
I've been playing several games installed through steam offline, so idk about them locking games under drm. For example, stardew valley, grim dawn. Beside that, most other games I play have an online component so I would need to authenticate in some form anyway, like path of exile, last epoch.
They are not saviours, but the competition is so bad that it's not strange for people to see the difference.
30% seems a lot yeah but I'm not discussing that, I'm talking about them being pro Linux as a policy way before the deck.
Indeed yes, I did mention SteamOS (I think that was the original name). Steam hasn't always supported Linux, it was years after it's release (maybe ten?) before they did from what I remember.
Yes it's good, but my part of the discussion is highlighting they aren't doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, otherwise there would be more evidence of it including lower fees, no DRM and and whatnot.
How is Dota on Linux? It's, well, a bit crap on Mac as the menu bar gets in the way (tried fiddling with settings but doesn't seem possible to fix it) and other stuff.
Well, my pc could barely run in in windows so the performance was basically the same haha. I tried it some years later and it ran perfectly.
It's very much an undemanding game so likely yours is kinda potato aha
Eh, depends. The laptop was not that good by any means, sure, but dota has always been the most demanding moba out of the competition, by far (league/hots). But yeah, then I got a proper desktop and it ran flawlessly ever since.
What are you even talking about? I have all of those installed as well, and a few others on top. I'm incredibly wary of any of them though - I don't know if GoG will be around in 10 years, I don't trust epic as far as I can throw them, I don't want to support ubisoft and EA, and Blizzard has made so many questionable choices that I'm at the point where I don't want to support them AND I don't believe they can make good games anymore.
It's about trust. I trust valve to allow me access to my games more than I trust the others. Doesn't mean I don't have the others, where did I say that?
I played Dota 2 from its first beta release, and many years after. Eventually stopped about 2 years ago. In that time I put 4 digit sum into that game, and received nothing that would give me any gameplay advantage. I did it to support the game, that also worked on Linux.
I understand that MTX are not ideal, but there are very different approaches to them. And at least in Dota 2, I can and did support it.
That is fair, Dota 2 is cosmetic only. TF2 on the other hand, is selling items with stats, mostly sidegrades rather than upgrades, but they do play into a certain kind of play, which does make it a de facto upgrade if your style of play matches the items use case.
Okay, I know nothing at all!
Hope you enjoy your Steam game library being ripped out of your hands or a forced subscription or recurring purchase or mandatory timed video ads showing up whenever someone who can make decisions for the future of the Valve LLC believes that is the right decision.
The fact is, whoever has possession (e.g. OWNERSHIP) of the decisions for a company can choose to do this, to not do this, or to do something else, or nothing at all. Inevitably decisions by whoever owns that control will change from the predecessors and eventually someone or some combination of someones constituting the deciding majority will sell out. No one lives forever.
Epic Games Store, Gog, UPlay (or whatever ubisoft's is called), Origin/EA Downloader have all not done this and yet they're not controlled by Gabe Newell.
Fact is that steam, no one else, started the road down the licensing and not ownership of games path we are firmly on with regards to PC.
Most PC's don't even have a disc drive any more, it's all downloads.
And Gog is the only one that still allows ownership and not licensing of software.
So yeah, you do know nothing at all.
"hurr durr nobody else has does it yet so clearly it can never happen"
Nobody else has 70%+ market share. The others are all competing for a bigger slice, they can't afford to be predatory.
The market leader can and the rest will follow suit. Haven't you seen overdraft charges (just now having laws change...decades after becoming a problem), minimal interest rates on savings accounts, ads in streaming services across the board (netflix wasn't first but the second they did it prime announced it), a reigning in of account sharing based on IP addresses for streaming services (happening across the board after a couple of big players did it)...
I get that you just can't imagine a world where your game library is RIPPED out of your hands after a 30 day notice of service changes... i've seen it happen time and time again for various platforms and games. Digital services can and will fuck you eventually.
Signed: Hellgate London lifetime subscription holder
They are completely different business operations. Please stop.
I'm sorry my opinion and analysis of these things is different than yours. I guess the difference between you and I is that i'd rather us both have a chance to voice those opinions rather than simply silence what you do not believe in.
I'm not following any dogma or parroting a political party line.. i'm not being a fanboy either (which is very dogmatic.) Are you?
It's not opinion, you just don't understand and there's no excuse for that.