this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
11 points (76.2% liked)

Sysadmin

7345 readers
507 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Debian has less complexityand is very stable. It has a nice wiki and a Debian system can run for a few years on unattended upgrades.

Edit: this post was originally about cost savings but that is not really a useful metric

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Debian uses like 200MBs of ram for a basic fresh install. That's negligible.

Unless you're deploying 500 virtual machines on a single server, that all run a single simple basic task the base ram usage of the OS shouldn't even be a factor.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

I think this is a fairly common use case. Maybe not the most common, but I've definitely seen this at multiple shops.

Density of RAM on hosts is often a limiting factor for scaling. Not every app is CPU hungry. Some just need to be available, and running a whole is for isolation is the way it's done in a lot of shops.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

For me it uses about 50mb. This means that something like a 1gb ram VM will go much farther.