this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
1254 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
1620 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 420 points 9 months ago (77 children)

TBF, they could probably make the "releases" page more prominent rather than having it buried in all the "code" stuff.

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 291 points 9 months ago (64 children)

GitHub has bad UX for people who just wanna download and use the programs

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 53 points 9 months ago (2 children)

not only the ux, some devs make it absurdly confusing to find a binary.

I don't want to throw anyone under the bus, but there's this one niche app.

their github releases at one point were YEARS out of date, they only linked to the current version in seemingly random issue reports' comments. And the current versions were some daily build artefacts you could find in a navigation tree many clicks deep in some unrelated website. And you'd better be savvy enough to download a successfully built artefact too. And even then the downloaded .zip contained all kinds of fluff unnescessary for using the app.

The app worked fine, sure, but actually obtaining it was fairly tricky, tbh.

[–] Cow2@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

These build artefacts probably weren’t meant for end users, that’s why they contained the “unnecessary fluff”.

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

absolutely, but they were in general (IIRC) suggesting them for the main downloads, but just not telling anyone outside the comments, which was the weird part

load more comments (61 replies)
load more comments (73 replies)