this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
258 points (97.8% liked)

Linux

48677 readers
428 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There already is an experimental image based on Silverblue with the alpha stage Cosmic Epoch Desktop.

Mainly finetuning and SELinux profiles are needed!

Join the Matrix Group! (yes, no Discord πŸ˜‰)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No, they only fucked CentOS, and they made RHEL proprietary last year. Since Ubuntu's decline, Fedora basically took it's place. It's very stable but not extremely outdated, has great security, always supports the newest technologies like Flatpak, Wayland, Pipewire, etc., has good Desktop spins and constantly innovates. The next Fedora KDE release will even completely drop support for X11, which is a good step because it forces developers to adopt Wayland. They also have pretty good immutable spins like Silverblue, Kinoite and others. Other cool distros like Nobara and uBlue are also built on top of Fedora.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Its not really proprietary. Developers get the code, and everyone that gets the binaries also gets the code. Thats GPL compliant.

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To quote Software Freedom Conservancy:

For approximately twenty years, Red Hat (now a fully owned subsidiary of IBM) has experimented with building a business model for operating system deployment and distribution that looks, feels, and acts like a proprietary one, but nonetheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

To quote both of you β€œnevertheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms”.

Were you trying to prove his point?

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

As shocking as this might be, I think he's agreeing, and offering supplimentary proof

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Obviously they comply with the GPL, otherwise they would get sued. But Red Hat acts exactly like a proprietary software company. That's what the quote is trying to say.

[–] jack@monero.town 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Devs get the code but can't redistribute it, so it's proprietary code

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They can look at it and change it, so it is not secret.

[–] jack@monero.town 1 points 10 months ago

That's not enough. Still proprietary