this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
135 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

58017 readers
3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Although there are some in development. But would you be interested in something like this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] masterspace@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Tl:dr he has no real point.

He just lists two failed smart helmet startups, then talks about a successful smart helmet that doesn't use a full HUD but uses an LED light bar. The only actual point he makes is that it's hard to make a display that's visible in the sun.

It's also a motor cycle channel so he makes points like "why not use your mirrors or built in dash" which is not really applicable to cyclists, eskaters, EUC users, etc.

[โ€“] DracolaAdil@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Fair reasoning but I still think Ryan is in the right path.

He is right that shoving a holographic display and the computer bits in the helmet either makes it bulky, heavy, and useless or you'd be paying up the wazoo for what is an engineering exercise.

A simpler interface that solves current problems in my opinion would be much better than trying to make an Ironman helmet.