this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
92 points (97.9% liked)

worldnews

4810 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Taliban held a public execution on Monday of a man convicted of murder in northern Afghanistan as thousands watched at a sports stadium, the third such death sentence to be carried out in the past five days.

The execution took place in heavy snowfall in the city of Shibirghan, the capital of northern Jawzjan province, where the brother of the murdered man shot the convict five times with a rifle, according to an eyewitness . Security around the stadium was tight, said the witness, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

It was also the fifth public execution since the Taliban seized power of Afghanistan in August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO troops were in the final weeks of their withdrawal from the country after two decades of war.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] afiresword@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Probably because the US didn't do them at a stadium...

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is a fine hair you are splitting there...

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I feel like public executions are a whole lotta worse than regular executions

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

a whole lotta worse than regular executions

Only to the people justifying state murder. To the person involved, they are still dead either way,

To me the Saudi.Taliban methods are more honest, though just as mortally reprehensible as the USA's. The Saudi's are proud that they murder their citizens and are not afraid to show it.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This has the same energy as saying all forms of execution are just as bad because the person is dead in the end anyway. Lol

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes. That was my point.

You find it funny.

I find it sad that a nation that claims life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as founding tenets defends the death penalty.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Of course I find it funny. Normally people recognize that even bad things can have levels of how bad they are.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lol right, the US does it more clinically with injections and gasses. Much better, historically speaking.

[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The suffering of an individual is not the same as a public execution in a stadium, nor is the message the same.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Proponents of the US death penalty claim it is for deterrence, so I'm not really seeing a difference. Pretty sure you can also go witness a US execution if you're so inclined.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Having a random civilian shoot a criminal with thousands of spectators in a sports stadium.

Executing a criminal with lethal injection to an audience of 12

Centrists: It’s the same thing!1!!

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

random civilian

Not exactly

[–] pizzawithdirt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Why is this comment upvoted so much?

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Centrists: It’s the same thing!1!!

Response from a country that does not ahve the death penalty.

Well, they are...

It is not how the state does it that is the problem but that the state does it.

There is no way to humanely kill someone who does not want to die.