this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
843 points (98.8% liked)

The Onion

4699 readers
864 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Part of the problem the left currently faces, regardless of revolutionary thought in general, is that environmental concerns are past the election cycle.

It is already too late to stop global warming at the 1.5 C target suggested in 2018.

Gradual reform will be too late. There is no way around it, we are acting too slow, and even if every country in the world flipped Green or whatever in 2028 that might still be too late.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Too late" is the exact language the fossil fuel execs want you to use. Even if specific targets are passed, every fraction of a degree matters. Stopping warming at 2 is better than 2.1 so if electing Biden puts us on the 2°c track thats better, and maybe the 2028 candidate can put us on the 1.8°C track. Thats a difference worth fighting for

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 10 months ago

Only if you see "gradual reform is too slow" and think "well that's all the options then!"

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

At least some believe that it was already too late in 2014 and our estimates are lagging about a decade. Not sure I believe that, but if true, it's even more important to take action ASAP.