1270
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 4 months ago

One of the problems with economic theory in general is assuming rational actors.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

I was told by my first economics professor that if I could solve that problem, and eliminate the assumption of rationality, I'd be the richest man on earth over night.

It's a problem, they know it's a problem, they just don't have a better answer.

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You can't even assume everyone can agree on the same definition of rational. If a business owner is a sadist they might value treating their employees like dirt more than the money they'd make if the business ran more efficiently. For a dickhead, rational self interest could mean forgoing profit to cause misery.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Rational in the economics sense just means that people do things for a reason. We're not acting randomly, we believe that when we put money towards a thing that we are receiving something of value for it.

Any more specific than that and we're not talking about rationality in the economics sense any more. Rationality does not mean correct. Just with cause.

[-] MonkeMischief 9 points 4 months ago

...they might value treating their employees like dirt more than the money they'd make it the business ran more efficiently.

This sounds like the metric for hiring middle-management if anything.

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago

It would certainly help explain middle management's obsession with return-to-office policies in the face of all the evidence that WFH increases productivity.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
1270 points (96.5% liked)

Comic Strips

11192 readers
3341 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS