1332
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Literally the next definition after that one….

not involving war or violence.

SYNONYMS…

Peaceful literally means non-violent…. Literally defines the bloody term lmfao.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

the next definition

So, overlapping meanings, not synonyms

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They are both, one is defined by other, AND they are synonyms.

Isn’t language fucked up?

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

One definition of peaceful is synonymous, and one isn't. This is exactly why language has so many synonyms, each one is sliiiightly different. Choosing one intentionally instead of another is important.

In this instance, "peace" is being defined (not directly, but through context) as status quo, going about your day unhindered. "Violence" is being defined as causing direct physical harm to a person, and possibly property depending on who you ask.

With these definitions laid out, it's easy enough to see a situation that is not violent (no one got hurt at all) and also not peaceful (some people's days were interrupted) - one person mentioned blocking a road. This is a FANTASTIC example of non-peaceful non-violent protest. No one likes a pedant.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No one likes a pedant.

Goes on a bloviated pedantic rant…

Yep, just like the people trying to say blocking a road isn’t peaceful. They are trying to pedantically choose a definition to make a point. Blocking a road is absolutely peaceful, trying to explain it any other way would be to be pendantic. Lmfao.

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
1332 points (100.0% liked)

196

15695 readers
1 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS