SchmidtGenetics

There’s a sentence before that with a major detail you are ignoring.

Unfounded for the main cause, it’s still a cause of the amnesia.

See this quote further down…. You did actually read the article… yeah…? You aren’t just taking a quote of context and using that for the entire basis of your asinine argument… are you…?

But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there's a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

So yes, it is absolutely a cause as that SHOULD prove without a doubt….

At the ages they specified, that’s NOT normal, maybe at 60 years yes, but not THAT young. You can’t just ignore key details and make your own story up.

Also, when people say half the time, it’s not a precise amount obviously, and you don’t think that’s not part of people lying to themselves? It’s probably less than half, but they don’t want to admit it, hence the approximation that’s quite obviously not the right amount.

They also stated it was half the time they don’t recall and the other half the story reminded them, so until that point, they didn’t recall anything actually… so why are you making shit up and lying here?

Right, but remembering nothing isn’t normal either… especially at the young age of 30, you seem to be ignoring major details here.

Just because some events are distorted doesn’t mean all should be. This seems to be the key part of the conversation that you’ve missed. I wasn’t absolute in any of my statements, yet you have been.

Which is factually incorrect, you should be able to recall specific events at all part of your life, your link doesn’t say otherwise now does it…?

The first sentence of your link says the opposite of everything you have claimed…

Despite the vivid and convincing detail with which people can recollect emotional experiences from their past, emotional memory is malleable.

Says its malleable, where does it say it gets erased…? You aren’t conflating these two vastly different things are you…?

I did say usually, I didn’t say only cause you muppet.

And did you actually read the article?

But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there's a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

Trauma is a cause, but it’s unfounded for the main cause. Which I never stated, maybe read the entire article and don’t take a specific quote out of context…?

That is just factually incorrect And what people lie to themselves to make them feel better. Humans are great at recollection, why would you claim otherwise…?

The age 0-3 is the only time you should have zero recollection, anything else is something you should talk to neurologist or psychologist about, but sure lie to make yourself feel better I guess…?

You should still be able to recall specific events at all portions of your life, it’s abnormal not to, but you can defend it and ignore potentially life limiting issues if you want.

Yeah, that’s it normal, hence why they remember and you don’t dude… you don’t think that’s not strange? That multiple friends recall events easily and you don’t…?

That still ain’t normal dude. You’re supposed to be able to recall memories from any point of your life…

That’s… that’s not normal.

Thats usually trauma suppressing memories, sorry mate,