this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
80 points (97.6% liked)

Ukraine

8306 readers
662 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/7336903

Speaking yesterday, Sergei Chemezov, the head of Russia’s Rostec state defense conglomerate, said that production of the A-50 would be restarted, according to a report from the state-run TASS news agency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

That aside, restarting production of a large and complex aeroplane is going to take years.

It's built on an Il-76 base, which is still in production. So my guess is that the base plane isn't probably that bad.

Plus, there are gonna be existing Il-76 planes that I assume that they could convert.

The A-50 hasn't been produced in over 30 years, though. So this isn't gonna be just rehiring some people who have been doing something else for a few years. This is restarting Soviet-era production.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Saying it hasn't been built in 30 years is a bit misleading. Although the base Il-76 airframes may be that old, the latest substantial avionics upgrade (designated A-50U) is less than 15 years old or so (first delivery in 2011), which isn't too bad for military and aircraft systems. A lot of the E-3 equipment is older. That is not to say it is more capable than the E-3, it probably isn't, but I'd say a fully functioning A-50U should not be underestimated. It's even got toilets! Then again, it is also not clear to me that any "U" models are currently airworthy.

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

But the point is they can't use the 2011 blueprints if it needs a lot of modern electronics.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I'd bet they really end up cobbling together a couple more from the scrap heaps they parked years ago. At one point they had a couple dozen. But it seems only a few were operational.