243

Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it's complicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kayjay@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

His reasoning was if the US didn’t make it, the Nazis would, and that would be even worse. He never wanted to make the bomb, it was just the lesser of two evils.

[-] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Making the bomb was a good decision, dropping two over civilians after the war finished was genocide.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 11 months ago

But the war wasn't finished.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

The US was never trying to exterminate the Japanese race and culture, so no it wasn't genocide. It was a fucked up act of war, maybe you could even call it an atrocity, but calling it a genocide is wrong by definition.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
243 points (100.0% liked)

World News

31482 readers
939 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS