this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1622 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We don't necessarily have to use batteries. In mountainous regions we already have stations that use surplus power to pump water up a mountain and then drop it down to generate energy when needed. Its basically a potential energy battery. But this is usually location limited and more expensive to set up.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, Pump Storage Hydroelectricity is a great option for storage. It's not the most efficient but it allows to store massive amount of energy.

I think today it's the main utility scale storage solution in the world.

[–] charles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're describing dams, and basically all the good locations are taken already.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, he's describing a pumped storage facility.

[–] AgentOrange@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf that would be two dams and they did use the plural of dams, technically 'dams' could be a pumped storage facility.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be even fairer, his central point that "all the good locations are taken already" only applies specifically to the regular type of dams that don't use pumped storage. For traditional hydroelectricity you need an easily-dammed-off hilly basin containing a large/high hydraulic head river, but for pumped-storage you just need the hilly basin.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

To be even fairerer, the body of water that gets pumped doesn't need to be dammed; if you have a steady enough river, you can suck the water right out of the side of it. Also, the basin isn't a prerequisite, you could build holding tanks at the top of a hill.

Hell, you could enclose the whole thing to control evaporation and use the same water over and over, no natural body of water necessary. Better yet, use a denser fluid to achieve the same result in a smaller space. You could probably fit the whole thing in a single building.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

There's also compressed air and flywheels for energy storage.