this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1665 points (99.8% liked)

Linux

48183 readers
1310 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Arch has rolling releases and is super stable.

[–] quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 13 points 1 year ago

Low occurence of notable bugs during daily use.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have never had Arch break during an update. I've never had it crash. I've never encountered an issue I couldn't resolve, and for that matter I don't really encounter issues. Usually the only problems are that I haven't installed a service that would usually come standard with another OS, so I have to check the wiki, install, and configure something.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't had Arch break during an update, but I always check the home page first, there are absolutely times my system would have broken during a blind update.

Arch doesn't support blind updates - it explicitly tells you to always check the home page before an update in case "out-of-the-ordinary" user intervention is required. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/System_maintenance

Basically, don't run arch unless you're willing to be a Linux system admin.

Similar, but a little more involved, to Debian testing or unstable. Install apt-listbugs and when you go to upgrade it'll let you know what issues are floating around. You can choose to work around the issue, or wait a day or two for the wrinkles to be ironed out.

[–] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Stable doesn't mean that the OS doesn't break, but that the way it functions doesn't change.

[–] quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org 5 points 1 year ago

I see. I asked because "stable" means different things in different distros. In Debian it means that interfaces and functionality in one version doesn't change. If I set up a script that interacts with the system in various ways, parsing output, using certain binaries in certain ways etc, I should be able to trust that it works the same year after year with upgrades within the same release. To some people this is important, to some people it isn't.

[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

"Ability to reboot without breaking a sweat"

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't OpenSUSE Tumbleweed be a much better option then?

[–] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

One of my staff runs Tumbleweed. I will get around to evaluating it one day.