this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
775 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2176 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

French President Emmanuel Macron met with parliamentary parties on Thursday. During the meeting Macron said he was open to the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine, as announced by, according to French newspaper L’Independant.

Fabien Roussel, a representative of the French Communist Party, said after the meeting that “Macron referenced a scenario that could lead to intervention [of French troops]: the advancement of the front towards Odesa or Kyiv.”

He noted that the French President showed parliamentarians maps of the possible directions of strikes by Russian troops in Ukraine.

Following the meeting, Jordan Bardella of the far-right National Rally party noted that “there are no restrictions and no red lines” in Macron’s approach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hope this makes Putin's stomach churn, as if his piss wasn't frothy enough since the start of this war revealed some of his navy was missing before they even began.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Part of his Navy went AWOL? I totally missed that what with "Russian Warship, Go Fuck Yourself."

[–] FiniteBanjo 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the only Russian Aircraft Carrier was completely immobile, the person in charge of overseeing repairs was charged with embezzling 45 Million Rubles, and that's only just the start of it. They were missing fuel, rations, winter clothes, you name it.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I keep reading stuff like this and Makes you really wonder how Russia was such a threat on paper and still fighting in Ukraine. Like what else is shotty or actively being embezzled right now.

[–] FiniteBanjo 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They might have cleaned house, they even killed Yevgeny Prigozhin.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but it's still a government run by thieves and murderers so it's not terribly unlikely that theft is still occurring.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd say it's a government run by the Mafia, but it's more accurate to say the government is the Mafia.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kleptocracy is a term I've heard tossed around before.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's deeper than that. Stealing from a country is one thing, forcibly sending young men to die in the mud for a genocidal war of conquest is something else.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, ok. He didn't have what he was told on paper. It's not so much that Navy personnel went AWOL, it's more that the actual capabilities of the Navy were greatly exaggerated on paper?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what they meant specifically, but maybe it was that some of their navy only existed in paper? I know that was the case for a lot of bits and pieces of their military in general but didn't realize it might apply to entire ships (which need to be supplied and crewed and seem overly blatant for even Russian corruption, though would be a good "gig" if they could manage it... Up until the point those ships are needed for actual military action).

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That seems like more of a likely explanation than personnel going AWOL