this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
724 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59542 readers
3266 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So.. if you can't see if someone is a "legit" (verified) account, why would you pay that fat f@ck for verifiXation?

[–] ZagTheRaccoon@reddthat.com 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I assume twitter blue offers other perks, that people might want without the shame of it being publicly known.

[–] justastranger@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their posts get prioritized in the algorithm iirc

[–] Fisk400@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

By a vast margin. Replies are apparently unusable as a thing for communication because if you have a checkmark the algorithm ignores any other consideration.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I heard of several people paying for blue to be able to edit tweets and such before Musk bought it.

[–] Frodo@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought that making blue check marks purchasable was one of the first things Musk did at Twitter after firing everyone.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know what it was called, but the purchasable blue check marks thing built off of an already existing service. It might have had a different name, I don't remember.

[–] Dee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Paying for Twitter Blue wasn't a thing until after Musk bought Twitter

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't quite see what your average Twitter user needs the information for about whose a paid member and whose not.

[–] CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I recall reading (forgot where) that someone with the Blue Check-mark has more "weight" when retweeting and responding to tweets. And that the Blue Checks can easily bury anyone without a Blue Check in Twitters algorithm. This was done intentionally by Elon to pressure people into paying.

It's why artists like Adam Ellis blocks anyone with the Blue Check; right-wingers hate him, and they can really fuck up his reach, so he just blocks anyone with the Blue Check-mark who replies/re-tweets his work so they can't even interact with his tweets. And he isn't the only artist that does this.

[–] klyde@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean why would they hide it? The only people who bought it are twats who think they're cool.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

You get to keep the premium features even if you hide the blue checkmark.