this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

News

22612 readers
4817 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Nebraska woman allegedly found a lucrative quirk at a gas station pump — double-swipe the rewards card and get free gas!

Unfortunately for her, you can’t do that, prosecutors said. The 45-year-old woman was arrested March 6 and faces felony theft charges accusing her of a crime that cost the gas station nearly $28,000.

Prosecutors say the woman exploited the system over a period of several months. Police learned of the problem in October when the loss-prevention manager at Bosselman Enterprises reported that the company’s Pump & Pantry in Lincoln had been scammed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

As always, it depends on what the courts say.

That said, yeah it kind of is on them not to crash. If I was on that jury, I would vote 'not-guilty' to anyone who picked up money that was laying around on the ground, especially if it's public property.

My mom once paid a painter hundreds of dollars in cash, and he lost most of it when pulling his hand out of his pocket and the money blew away. Anyone who finds that money should get to keep it.

A bootlegger was acquitted in the US for killing his wife during Prohibition after he got out of jail and found out she sold all his stuff. He literally admitted to doing it and the jury said "not guilty" and cheered when the verdict was read.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

it depends on what the courts say.

The court decide what laws are to be enforced, the laws being decided by the legislative part of the government, which is formed of the people, who are you.

So indirectly, our subjective morality decides what the courts say, indirectly. I'm asking what your innate sense would tell you to do in that hypothetical?

My mom once paid a painter hundreds of dollars in cash, and he lost most of it when pulling his hand out of his pocket and the money blew away. Anyone who finds that money should get to keep it.

Well, in transactional situations that would be pretty subjective. Who fudged it? Subjective. Depending on the sum, there could definitely be an argument.

And what if it was like an open check (btw checks are not a thing everywhere, I've seen maybe a dozen in my life and I'm 34, they're so insecure we don't use them) for a million dollars? With the value, it would definitely be different.

I think there are laws about lottery coupons as well. Different ones for different places in the world, but still.

Some of those laws say for instance you have to return it, but also that returning something very valuable gives you the right to a finder's fee.

So "finder's keeper's" isn't quite as simple as we'd like to.

In this specific instance, I really don't mind someone having abused the system, but technically it would be at least a bit of fraud here. Tanking up once or twice for free would be an understandable happy accident, draining 28k worth of gas is clearly malicious and organised theft.

I don't mind the occasional theft from corporations, but 28k is a bit beyond the normal robin hooding. Corporations suck currently but we can't replace a thieving system with a system with even more thieving.

Casual thieving fine, but this is rather organised

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

It’s going to come down to, was there reason to suspect the machine was a bug?

I assume she swiped rewards, and the. Swiped rewards again when it was asking for a credit/debit card; in which case it’d be the card equivalent of trying to pay with Monopoly money.