this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
234 points (100.0% liked)

news

23514 readers
582 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Obama had reached a diplomatic agreement with Iran on their nuclear program

But he held the line on Iraq and even opened up fronts in Syria. If the Iranian military left itself exposed like that? Obama might be willing to take the shot, if he thought he could advance his position further in the region.

Trump was a big step backwards there, as he was on Cuba. Even with the DPRK I don't think anything substantive materialized.

Obama was trying to carrot the Cubans toward privatization after decades of stick. But he was just as invested in an eventual corporate takeover as Clinton or Carter.

Trump was a flailing putz who did everything for attention. His moves weren't strategic past the next headline.

Looking at everything reasonable in Trump's favor, he was just as bad as Obama on foreign policy.

He was worse in strategy, which made him better in consequence. He undermined international institutions and tried to grift NATO states. He made catty remarks and empty threats to look tough, without having any kind of interest in a protracted commitment to any one conflict.

A Trump mix up at the White House would force another big wave of resignations and bring in a bunch of new grifters and know nothings.

Whether that would be better or worse is forever up to debate. But it will erode US statecraft faster than a stable continuous second term.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was worse in strategy, which made him better in consequence.

I don't give Trump credit for accidentally harming stuff like NATO because the same rash decisions that did that almost started war with Iran (twice, actually, if I'm remembering correctly). Accidental good is also good you can't count on going forward.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't give Trump credit for accidentally harming stuff like NATO because the same rash decisions that did that almost started war with Iran

The biggest thing keeping us out of a war with Iran is the Zagros Mountains. Trump bombing an Iraqi air field fucked US/Iran diplomacy for a generation and caused every other government official in the region to take a step back from the nearest American military base. But it wasn't going to initiate a direct attack from Iran into Iraq (because they're trying to cultivate an alliance). If anything, it heightened the support Iran had for Yemen, which culminated in the closing of the Gulf of Adan to... 90%+ of traffic through the Suez? If you want to talk about something that hurt Western nations as much as losing Solemani hurt Iran... Billions, if not tens of billions of dollars, and right through the heart of Mediterranean shipping (ie, Israeli accumulated wealth) industry.

If we can assign Trump credit for that... well... god damn. Way to go, dude.

Accidental good is also good you can't count on going forward.

Biden is consistently bad on policy, while maintaining a pipeline of experienced professionals with long term job aspirations. Trump occasionally prat-falls over his own dick, while hundreds of experienced professionals in the various agencies flee the sinking ship he's created.

I see Trump as a kind-of American Boris Yeltsin. I don't think that will make America a better place, but perhaps it will allow other nations to assert themselves when the US retreats from the global stage.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But it wasn't going to initiate a direct attack from Iran into Iraq

It did exactly that! There were acts of war exchanged by both sides; we're extremely lucky the situation didn't boil over.

Trump accidentally did some harm to the empire, but we were right on the precipice of a war that would have killed (easily) millions.

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

It did exactly that!

Iran reportedly informed the Iraqi government of an imminent attack shortly beforehand. The United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the attack was intended to kill, however some analysts suggested the strike was deliberately designed to avoid causing any fatalities in order to dissuade an armed American response

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

The goal at this point is for America to become so preoccupied with internal contradictions that they withdraw from the world. Allowing for multipolarity (and God willing, unipolarity from the Chinese).