this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
280 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38647 readers
2277 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The House on Wednesday passed a bill with broad bipartisan support that would force TikTok’s Chinese owner to either sell the hugely popular video app or be banned in the United States.

Republican leaders fast-tracked the bill through the House with limited debate, and it passed on a lopsided vote of 352-65, reflecting widespread backing for legislation that would take direct aim at China in an election year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I never said the bill was perfect. It is a good first step. Ideally all social media should be held accountable, but they are the ones who make political donations, so the chances of major overhaul are not all that great.

They want to ban Chinese ownership of the company because it's politically popular, but it does also have merit. China can and will exert it's influence to it's advantage.

Tiktok might be a good service right now (...debatable) but it's threat comes from being able to push China's authoritarian agenda.

And insults have no place in reasonable discussion. Who's mind are you going to change by calling them insane?

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nothing has to be perfect. It just has to work, and mostly work for the people. When it comes to laws, that is.

Now, let me understand you clearly. You still think that banning some silly little app, where probably in your opinion (since I take it you don’t use it for the “debatable” part) it’s just a bunch of people doing challenges or dancing or whatever silly shit you have in your mind of what’s on there, but you don’t seriously think there are just a little more important shit going on right now than some stupid app, who’s only authoritarian reach on me in the last 4 years is the stupid ads paid for by the shitty companies here in America, like KIDS being told that since they can’t afford to pay for their lunch, they don’t get to EAT!?

And you’re worried about a fucking APP?!

Holy. Fuck.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You seem awfully worried about it too

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I am. Thank you for noticing.

It’s batshit crazy the people in charge are more worried about a fucking APP than people going hungry.

Do you not think it’s insane that a majority of the house voted for something so stupid, but they can’t even agree on wether or not a child should have to pay to eat at a building they are mandated to be at by said government…?

I suggest you reread my original comment. I added a TLDR for people like you who somehow lost the plot of the comment.