this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
280 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2292 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The House on Wednesday passed a bill with broad bipartisan support that would force TikTok’s Chinese owner to either sell the hugely popular video app or be banned in the United States.

Republican leaders fast-tracked the bill through the House with limited debate, and it passed on a lopsided vote of 352-65, reflecting widespread backing for legislation that would take direct aim at China in an election year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not getting hung up on anything, the implication that this is a conspiracy to shut down the ability of people to communicate is the clear implication, and essentially the crux of the point.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Right…

I suggest you read the original comment again….

I added a TLDR for people like you who lost the plot…

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I clearly responded to your full comment because I said I was with you until the conspiracy nonsense. The point of (paraphrased) "They won't help kids, but they'll sure shut down an app that allows us to talk to each other about how bad they are!" is clearly the intent of this legislation is not to protect, but oppress. But it doesn't make sense considering all of the other ways we have to communicate where I see people complaining about how things are.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

TLDR: You should be upset these fucks are spending our tax money on banning an app, instead of using our tax money on more important shit like people living in the streets, kids going hungry in schools, kids being sent to work at the age of 12+, and medical debt being an inch away from us all. You should all be as upset as I am. The fact you aren’t, is very very concerning.

I truly do not care about the app that much.

You’re right. It is one of the many forms we have to communicate with each other.

My main comment point was that they are banning some silly little app instead of addressing way more important things.

It’s insane that they are banding together for the first time in years (besides when they want to increase their paychecks!) where there unanimous backing from both sides.

That’s all my comment was trying to get across.

You have people cheering that these fucks have banded together to get an app banned, but they can’t even agree to feed children.

“Yeah! I HATE TikTok, this is GOOD news!” But refuse to look at ALL the other issues going on that should definitely be a way higher priority than some stupid app.

That’s the main point. There’s no hidden conspiracy to find. It’s the fact we care so much about banning an app, but not about more important shit like feeding our fellow citizens and making sure our children are cared for properly.

Insane. It’s just insane to me we’re fine with our government spending our taxes and shit on this.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

There’s no hidden conspiracy to find.

Then you shouldn't have included it as part of your post because it undercuts and detracts from your actual point.

But, yes, I wish we would do more important things, but there seems to be good reason to ban this app, it's no real loss if it disappears, and Republicans are not going to want to help children, so I don't see what the point is in getting so upset over this.