this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy

12542 readers
54 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
nutomic@lemmy.ml
72
If the ideal setup is many medium sized instances rather than a few huge ones, wouldn't that mean users would need to subscribe to duplicate communities in all of those instances? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Otherwise, if we have a lot of medium sized instances but the most popular communities are hosted on just a few huge instances, doesn't that defeat the purpose of distributing load across many instances?

If that's the case, how do we solve the cumbersome user experience of having to subscribe to the same community over and over again across a ton of medium instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had r/europe and r/worldnews in mind. Both communities had been hijacked by mods who turned them into echo chambers.

[โ€“] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm unfamiliar with /r/Europe, but /r/worldnews did have some decent alternatives, such as /r/neutralnews. But most people seemed to flock to /r/worldnews, probably because of the name.

So lemmy having multiple communities with the same name could help with that, but there's still the natural human tendancy to go to the more popular community. I know I prefer to go to the larger one much of the time, unless there are multiple sufficiently large options, in which case I'll generally go with the smaller one first.