this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
217 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59696 readers
5186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Driverless vehicle that uses sensors to measure road surface quality and repair small cracks to stop them turning into potholes and hopefully decreasing the cost of road maintenance while improving average surface quality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 53 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You mean trains, bikes, and good public transit? Because those all mean less wear and tear on the roads overall. Trust an American because we've been at this for seventy years. If you guys go all in on car dependency, it's not only going to break the banks of government from local to national, but it's going to break your bank and destroy what small businesses you have left.

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Good public transit does not mean less wear and tear on the roads, absolutely not. As I stated in a different comment, a bus that replaces 10-20 cars causes similar road damage as 10000 cars. Which is fine, but for completely different reasons. Public transport is good because it allows more pedestrian-friendly cities, reduces pollution, etc; just road wear and tear is not one of the reasons why it's good, it's one of the drawbacks.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago

Well, at least trams and trains don't produce wear on roads, and a good freight train network reduces the need for heavy trucks.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Good point, thanks for holding me accountable to the truth. We can't set things right if we're selling people a bill of goods; that's what got us here in the first place.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This guy acting like US invented cars and have divine knowledge from this experience.

Dude, Europe got 10x better public transport and are far less car dependent than the US.

Our cities are too old to be build with cars in mind.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think they're saying "America is a bad example, please don't follow us"

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.de 10 points 8 months ago

Our cities are too old to be build with cars in mind.

Vast parts of the cities I lived in were completely bulldozed to accommodate cars.

[–] Traister101 5 points 8 months ago

And yet you guys are attempting to follow in our footsteps with new construction. Also the US was also too old to be built with cars in mind, we bulldozed our cities for the car (ಥ_ʖಥ)

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Only 70 years...?