this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16387 readers
815 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

With indie teams of 50 or less people turning out bangers, and AAA studios of 500+ people turning out messy slop, I think one big answer to your question is quite obvious: the size of the team getting bigger has a negative effect on the quality of the game.

Big teams are harder to direct, and harder to keep pointed in a coherent direction. In other words, big ships turn slower than small ships. When you start making a game, usually the game you end up with is pretty different from the one you started on, and smaller teams can handle those changes much quicker than giant teams.

Overhiring is almost always a symptom of someone who doesn't know what they're doing thinking that adding more people will somehow make something faster or better quality, when in reality adding too many people actually will have the opposite effect.