I see variations of this argument all over the place. The thing is, if you mistreat an entire population of people for several decades and they get the opportunity to repay that in kind, who could blame them? At some point the violence needs to end. The people of Israel should understand that. Unfortunately, it seems they do not.
That's why ICJ should make a ruling. Then this circus stop.
It's like when a couple wants to divorce but are living in the same house and start screaming at each other, then throwing objects, then knives to get the child.
Then when the court decides on the issue they are much more prone to stop the Insanity
I see variations of this argument all over the place. The thing is, if you mistreat an entire population of people for several decades and they get the opportunity to repay that in kind, who could blame them? At some point the violence needs to end. The people of Israel should understand that. Unfortunately, it seems they do not.
That's why ICJ should make a ruling. Then this circus stop.
It's like when a couple wants to divorce but are living in the same house and start screaming at each other, then throwing objects, then knives to get the child.
Then when the court decides on the issue they are much more prone to stop the Insanity
International courts have told Israel to stop many times and they rarely, if ever, listen. Why would this time be different?
I mean it wouls be nice if court ruled what is Palestinian territory and declare the occupation after 1967 as officially illegal