this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
487 points (98.2% liked)

xkcd

8888 readers
5 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2909

Alt text:

If you pick a low enough orbit, it gives you a lot of freedom to use a lightweight launch vehicle such as a stepladder.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Option #4 - This reads like Mr. Munroe is setting things up for another entertaining article/video/book topic.

The energies required to move the moon closer to the Earth would be staggering. Then there's the gravitational impact to consider, and how fast it would need to be moving to keep a stable low-earth orbit; assuming that's what we're aiming for as a rendezvous. My guess is that, combined, this is close and fast enough to create mile-high tsunamis every day (maybe even all day), all over the planet. Meanwhile, our astronauts would be on the lunar surface watching the destruction from safety.

[–] Magnetar@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You should watch the cinematic masterpiece "Moonfall".

Really shows how the Oscars are corrupt when faced with the fact that this movie didn't make the cut.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The tidal forces would probably tear apart the moon into rings, the best place to watch would be a higher orbit.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Good call. There's a good Joe Scott video on what that would look like, IIRC.