this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
283 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32581 readers
1060 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Most people in corporate have no fucking idea what they are doing and a good setup will have these meetings focus everyone on the same thing and making sure they are progressing. This setup may not be useful for coding untestable and undocumented code in your basement, but it's very useful in big companies. Unfortunately there are also many twats that abuse this in order to make themselves look useful so it's very easy to end up in a broken system if no one is keeping an eye out for this.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've recently been in a scrum team that failed to follow most of this structure and it was a shambles.

I agree that this setup gives purpose to each meeting, and they are all things that are important.

If we could have basically only these meetings then that would be ideal, IMO.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty much the idea behind the scrum events, they should reduce the need for other meetings. As a note the weekly stand-up and 1:1 that show up in the picture are not scrum events.

Thing is, the scrum guide is pretty clear that if you don't follow the whole thing, you shouldn't call it scrum and you're on your own. It can still work, but only if the mindset is right and people involved know what they are trying to do with it. Which most times is not the case.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah I'm not sure what the weekly stand up is trying to achieve, maybe I'm just lucky but I don't recall ever being in a team with these.

I do believe 1:1s are important, but that's outside of scrum and should be on a schedule that works for the participants (might be an hour weekly for some, half an hour monthly for others).

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Moving jobs I went from 1 meeting a week to multiple a day and all It has done is made me think my new job has no idea what is important priorities shift almost daily due to other meetings that I'm not a part of and nothing gets done properly because we dont have time to refine.

The goal should be to have as few meetings as possible because it means they are unnecessary. If you have a plan for your backlog set, you don't need to meet up for an hour every week to sort it out

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Big companies? Try any company.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 8 months ago

It all depends on how much time is spent on them. A few hours a week? No biggie. 3+ hours every single day? Do they think we can develop anything like that?