this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
109 points (95.8% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2261 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Giorgia Meloni will testify at a court in the Sardinian city of Sassari in a bid to send a message about the problem

Italy’s prime minister is seeking €100,000 (£85,374) in damages after deepfake pornographic videos of her were shared on the internet.

‘Deepfakes’ are images or videos where the face of one person, in this case Giorgia Meloni, is digitally put onto the body of another.

Two men accused of making the videos, a father and son aged 74 and 40, are being investigated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The risk of a Streisand effect here is pretty high. Hope she's thought it through.

Regrettably, were going to see more and more apps and websites that just automate this kind of abuse.

It'll be sold as a new way to watch porn. Just upload a few pics of your crush and check the boxes for which acts you want to see, and boom, you're downloading it.

It's gonna be a wild ride for a while, no pun intended.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's pretty messed up, not fair for anyone to experience this whether it's Taylor Swift or this conservative PM.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

~~conservative~~ fascist PM

Fixed that for you. It's important not to normalize fascism by pretending that it's just your usual possibly somewhat benign conservatism.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Alright. Where do you want to draw the line? At the automation? How do you put that into legislation that wouldn't also ban manual editing methods? What if someone just face swapped & edited every single frame manually? Would even provide a much better result than those "AI" algorithms.

This is just media hysteria.

[–] yildolw@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The historical difficulty is enforceability. That made the usual line "no making money on your creepy idiocy", because once money is involved there are levers of enforcement. Advertising support is one form of making money

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Where do you want to draw the line? At the automation? How do you put that into legislation that wouldn't also ban manual editing methods?

One difference is that manual editing methods take some amount of skill and time.

Automated removes that barrier and makes it possible for people to make hundreds/millions of images in little time, in bulk and with no effort or skill.

Manual will be more limited in its abundance (and presumably spread) due to those limits.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago

The difference is kinda the same. You could've paid someone to photoshop shit too, now you pay for some dubious "AI" services instead of setting them up yourself, which is a major difference in difficulty and would quickly take away the illusion of the whole "AI" magic.

Either way, I don't really care. Let them do it. As long as they don't use it to make money or for things like blackmail or harassment it should be up to them what they jerk off to. I doubt the fascist melon experienced much if any actual damage from that. She literally did not give a shit about the depictions of her as a fascist but somehow some bad deepfake porn videos are crossing the line. Yeah... Right...