160
submitted 11 months ago by nitneroc@lemmy.one to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

When the very first cars were built, only the rich could afford it, but now a large part of the population (in developed countries) has one or more.

What do you think will be such an evolution in the future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iamthewalrus@lemmy.world 79 points 11 months ago

Lab-grown meat.

“In 2013, the world’s first cultivated meat burger was served at a news conference in London. It allegedly cost $330,000 to make. That figure has plummeted in the almost-decade since, but cell-grown proteins are yet to clock in anywhere close to the same price as conventional meats.” (Source: https://www.bonappetit.com/story/lab-grown-meat)

The goal is to get the price down to a level the average supermarket shopper can afford, and if the science is successful it has the potential to revolutionize the food chain.

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 33 points 11 months ago

Once this is available and affordable, I will never eat animal meat again.

[-] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

Totally agree - from an ideological standpoint I totally agree with Vegans/Vegetarians on the fact that meat produces unnecessary suffering and (more directly important to us humans) huge amounts of greenhouse gases and wasted calories. But from a practical standpoint I've just never been able to convince myself to make such a huge change to my diet - but lab grown meat is literally having your cake and eating it too in that regard.

Hell I'd happilly pay 2x for a cut of meat that was lab grown instead of coming from an animal - and imagine how amazing you could make - for instance - a steak when you have 100% control over it's fat/muscle distribution/ratio. Making a Wagyu steak, vs a typical cut would be as simple as tweaking some settings

[-] weew@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

I'm already fairly satisfied with the newer plant-based meat replacements. They just need to come down in price to below actual meat.

[-] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Not everyone can eat them though, for whatever reason it can cause extreme abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and more in some people.

I know, because I'm one of those people. Took 3 impossible burgers before I noticed the pattern and looked into it.

Felt like I was dying the first two times, felt like I was dying the third time too.. but that was mollified slightly by recognizing the pattern and hating myself for doing it to myself.

[-] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 5 points 11 months ago

All I can think of is capitalism filling it with shit.

Why make 50 beef burgers when I can add filler ingredients and make 100.

Capitalism breaks everything.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

If cultured meat becomes cost-effective to produce, it may become the filler.

[-] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I add fillers at home when I make burgers.

Often times its just panko. Gets an extra burger or two out of the meat, and no one has ever noticed the difference. Still fantastic, juicy hamburgers.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't see it happening outside a reduced group of rich countries. They will probably license the method for a very high and unaffordable price.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Due to the environmental impacts they would have a strong incentive to not do that.

Not because they care that much about the climate, but if they can make a significant percentage of continents like Africa and Asia reduce their food production emissions they they themselves would need to reduce theirs less

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 11 months ago

if they can make a significant percentage of continents like Africa and Asia reduce their food production emissions they they themselves would need to reduce theirs less

I'm confused by this. Care to elaborate?

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Sure.

Western countries are under pressure by their own population to fight climate change. For that they need to implemente measures that reduce their impact, which most governments would rather not do as it usually comes with some “negative consequences”. Now, if they can make the problem smaller by having other countries change their way of living instead, it’s a win for them, because problem gets smaller, pressure decreases (or more realistically increases less) and they can focus on making lines go up and getting their votes.

So I don’t think that they will have a big incentive in keeping it private. Of course private companies will, but that’s a different story.

Hopefully that made sense. It’s late here xD

[-] iamthewalrus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I’m inclined to agree, at least initially. I suspect it’ll depend on how much demand and competition there is in the field once it’s democratized. The other consideration is extraneous factors (e.g. soaring price of meat due to climate change) that could make lab-grown the cheapest/best option eventually.

[-] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Would licensing matter outside of rich countries? I confess I know very little about patent law and things like that, but I'd imagine that if - say - Thailand wanted to use the same method as the U.S. Company, that the U.S. company wouldn't actually be able to do anything about it, since they're not under the same jurisdiction

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago
[-] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

I know that, I also know that it has a relatively narrow scope, participation is by treaty and varies wildly from country to country, and often isn't enforced well. Hence my comment

[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I can already buy impossible beef at my supermarket, it's not even that much more that regular beef. And most fast food places offer it as well.

[-] ribboo@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago
[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

Is it not? It's literally grown in a lab. What is the difference?

[-] CrimsonFlash@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 months ago

It's made from soy. Not grown in a lab.

[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago
[-] iamthewalrus@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

In fairness, it’s kind of a freaky concept. Real meat, yet no animal was killed to provide it. Doesn’t sound like it should be possible. I can’t wait to try it.

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 7 points 11 months ago

It is super good, though.

[-] ribboo@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Impossible beef is plant based. Lab grown meat is made from animal cells.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
160 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

42525 readers
2074 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS