Free and Open Source Software

17943 readers

23 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Florp, the Firefox fork with an awful name, is fully source-available again (github.com)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/foss@beehaw.org

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The repository for the previously private submodule is still called Floorp-private-components, though it's public.

https://blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-11/ is a maintainer's official response to... Reddit, which crossposted me apparently. Hooray!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NorthCountryHermit@lemm.ee 37 points 7 months ago (3 children)

"Boohoo, people used my publicly available source to do their own thing and now I'm mad and want to get paid".

That's the gist of the article. Dev got butthurt that his project didn't take off and blames "forking".

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 30 points 7 months ago

And in fairness, isn't his project itself a fork? What is he paying to the upstream dev for use of their source code?

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 17 points 7 months ago

Give the guy a break. Theyre young, dumb and never knew it would explode like this.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Where the heck did you get "I want to get paid"?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

All over the article you posted:

and since Floorp currently has no advertising, my own salary is, of course, zero. It’s just not going to last.

I have made many plans, including earning development money on this projects, but all have been derailed by open source projects.

There is some code in the closed source code to prepare for this. If these are forked, my hundreds of hours will have been wasted.

The purpose is to learn how to publish code that cannot be used for forking as open source.

I have to obligate the folks to choose whether they want to pay me or help me code.

So hes forked the open source Firefox, added some polish, and is now miffed that others have taken his forked project and forked it themselves, because it cuts off a possible income stream he had planned. That code, the things he intended to profit from, is whats hidden in the "closed source" part of the repo. He says he will open source it eventually, likely after he figures out a way to profit from all of the code Mozilla kindly let him fork for free.

He doesnt want anyone else to profit from the hundreds of hours of code hes added to the millions of hours of free code hes currently trying to profit from. This is of course a very reasonable and consistent moral stance in line with common open source principles.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They didn't but open source enthusiasts hate it when developers even try to imply not wanting their contributions used without attribution, it's basically killing puppies in this community.

They'll only ever use it to make money themselves without anything in return just like the corporations who do the same but then they'll call themselves morally principled for reasons.

que a moron trying to explain why opensource developers should bend to their will about what "opensource" should be for them.

[–] NorthCountryHermit@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Eh, Im not even an open-source enthusiast. I just have low tolerance for people so full of themselves.