this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
153 points (91.4% liked)

Selfhosted

39937 readers
379 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
153
The domain aftermarket has a big problem (domainnamewire.com)
submitted 7 months ago by TCB13@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here's my take:

The domain aftermarket has a big problem... it exists. This market shouldn't ever be allowed to exist in the first place. ICANN should've blocked this bullshit a long time ago and forced registrars to just let domains expire and free the space. Also add a few provisions about unused domain names and about selling them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I even recall a time I negotiated back and forth on Sedo to buy a domain name, and it turned out the seller didn’t own the domain.

I'm sorry, how is this NOT fraud?

I agree with OP. Domains should just expire if they're not renewed.

And honestly, I'm against the hoarding and resale of them too. They're a finite resource and should be limited to a fixed number per human being. And only transferred for free not resold.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

They’re a finite resource and should be limited to a fixed number per human being. And only transferred for free not resold.

While I don't agree with the free transfer I agree with the the other part. ICANN should fine and obliterate registrars that keep domains for themselves and individual hoarders.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Even if they are finite, the number would be so impossibly large that for all practical purposes this would not be the case.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

While you're technically correct (the best kind) I'd still argue that the subset of finite addresses that are human readable and relayable is significantly smaller. If you disagree just fill out a form on my website:

complaints.dng8jeispqo9rjrjejqkfns6gusjehrjrow7pwjqlqejtbdkwo0118999 8819991197253fja3k1wjri55foem8wms.co.biz

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Sure and I know that you meant. But I also think that with a little creativity and compromise it’s also not difficult at all to get something that’s not that long and also easily said.

[–] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The free transfer would be hard to enforce.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think it could be accomplished. If any income from the sale or transfer of a domain, above the standard registration fees, is taxed at 100% that would stop most, especially businesses. No it wouldn't be perfect, but no tax system is.

[–] jkjustjoshing@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

ICANN doesn't have the authority to levy a tax. I'm not sure how you would enforce a system like that.