I think now is a great time to remind everyone, like sync's developer, Lemmy's developers need to be paid too! The amount of time all the devs put into making lemmy exist, in my opinion, should be worth some of your money. If you can afford it, donating to the people who develop lemmy and/or the people keeping your home instance up will accelerate the incredible growth of lemmy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheFriendlyArtificer@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I call it, "subscription fatigue".

Work bought me an iPad. It was my first foray into iOS.

I'm not sure what the app store was like before, but I couldn't find a single app that didn't have a subscription plan. Even a simple SSH client built using open source libraries wants $6.00/mo.

I totally understand why people groan and do a face palm any time they see yet another app wanting to charge them monthly, hoping that once there you'll forget that you've subscribed.

The only reason that I paid for Sync is that I've seen the dev interactions and their dedication to the project. I would never ever pay for a software subscription from any of the big players. For a single person setup, I'm more than happy to do it. I donate to my favorite podcasts and my favorite designers from Thingiverse.

Late stage capitalism and the rent-seeking economy sucks. But becoming accustomed to individuals paying other individuals is one of the things we're going to have to do to make it suck less.

[–] swirle13@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

From the developer's point of view, subscription makes more sense as people benefit from continual development and updates, and the dev continually gets paid for their time.

I paid $1 or $2 for sync pro like 9 years ago and back then, it took a lot to get me to pay for apps. The more I use the app, the more I got for my money per hour spent using the all. But the more work the dev did after he got my money, the less he gets paid for his labor, per hour.

Nowadays, $1-2 feels like a steal for an app, especially for a one time payment. I haven't paid for ad-free or ultra yet, but I intend to because he's shown a long history of listening to his user base and updating/fixing things in a timely manner, which that type of service also is something I value as a customer, even if it isn't a tangible benefit.

[–] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

I'm one of those with subscription fatigue but that's not a problem with sync because you don't have to subscribe. You can just pay the one time ad-free option and that's all right with me. I honestly don't know what's going on with the vitriol against sync on lemmy. I think most people don't realise that nobody needs to subscribe to sync, you can use it for free with ads OR you pay the one time fee and have it ads free forever without the other subscription features.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Termius?

I might pay for their subscription if it was like $2 a year. Cloud sync is not worth $120 a year.

I only really need it when I'm transferring devices. Oddly enough, they also seem to give you a free one week trial whenever you do so.

I get that they're targeting enterprise customers, but they could just charge a smaller fee for individuals and go hard on companies who are skirting the rules.