this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
616 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32561 readers
488 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vacuumoftalent@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Looks ugly until you need to implement something and realize you've been blessed with a description of business logic.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 17 points 8 months ago

Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Until they find out that the way to descriptive variables or functions needs to be extended with new business logic requiring renaming of functions again and again.

I think maintaining code with this level of verbose naming, will be a pain over time. If they don't let the naming slip, and then they could as well use cryptic 3 letter names.