1450
Trump bible (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 213 points 3 months ago

I hate how the Bible is being used as a nationalist prop. Nationalism was a theme of the old testament and Jesus called his followers to move beyond national identity. But that's how fascism works, it apropariates instead of actually creating something new.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 132 points 3 months ago

Trump's bible also includes the US Constitution for an added layer of irony.

[-] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago

That seems to be a desecration of the Bible. I wonder if "Christians" will even raise an eyebrow.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's okay, he doesn't seem to sell to actual Christians.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Have they changed the fallacy to "No true Christian" yet?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 9 points 3 months ago

"No true Scotsman" is when you modify the initial claim to conveniently skirt evidence to the contrary. Saying "I'm ashamed these people are allowed to call themselves Scotsmen/Christians" is another matter

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I mean partaking in the American civil religion does seem to violate one of the first rules of Christianity. They’re supposed to be kinda monotheistic from what I hear

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Usually, when various Christian denominations call some writings (which other denominations consider canonical) apocryphal, they at least recognise that those writings are roughly as old as the canonical writings and the subject matter concerns the same topics (i.e. accounts on lives of Biblical figures, and doctrinal material). Just that they don't agree it's valid teaching or doctrine. Apocryphal, as said.

I mean, American Evangelicals wouldn't just randomly slap demonstrably modern material that is explicitly not religious doctrine, not even worded as such, in the book and call it Biblical canon, right? ...right? ...that'd be patently stupid, right? ...nobody would do that? ...people would have at least some problem with that?

(Me, I'm not American, and an ex-Christian. I actually liked the Deck of Cards better. These days, I just do the same thing with Tarot deck I guess. ...confuse myself endlessly with esoteric imagery.)

[-] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Thank you. I really like your post and wanted to give you more than just an upvote

From a fellow ex-christian. Ex since the age of 11.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
1450 points (100.0% liked)

196

15689 readers
1 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS