Gay: News, Memes and Discussion

1882 readers

363 users here now

Welcome to /c/Gay - Your LGBTQ+ Haven

We're more than just a community; we're your haven for celebrating LGBTQ+ culture and connecting with like-minded individuals.

Community Rules:

~ 1. No bigotry. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 4. Keep it LGBTQ+ related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love posts but 3-4 in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Stamets@lemmy.world

Lydia_K@startrek.website

565

Seconded (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/gay@lemmy.world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gonna continue this from the other guy before me;

Tolerance is not a paradox. Tolerance is a contract. Those who break the contract of tolerance with intolerance no longer deserve it, and should be excluded from the protections given to those who do follow it.

[–] solarbabies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You sound like a demagogue. There is no nuance or critical thinking in your take whatsoever.

Watch this and tell me it's impossible to tolerate "intolerant" people.

You're just hurting yourself by not putting effort into discussions that would win you more allies.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago

Watch this and tell me it's impossible to tolerate "intolerant" people.

I appreciate the share, but the last thing I want is youtube to start adding political content to my feed after i've spent all this time curating its algorithm into something that is mine.

There is no nuance or critical thinking in your take whatsoever.

There is a lot of nuance in my statement. But you are right, I didn't give any examples. So let's pull one of yours from earlier;

How can the point of Pride be to "tolerate everyone with no exceptions," while at the same time "never tolerate the intolerant"? You can't have both!

Q: Is a gay man allowed at Pride? A: in general, yes

Q: What if you learn they don't like furries? A: then no, they can't.

Q: What if they want to be accepting of furries but they don't know how? A: then sure, yes, let's discuss.

Q: What if they killed a furry once? A: then no, absolutely not!

Q: What if they went to prison for 20 years for their crime, realized what they did was wrong, and decided to make a concerted effort every day to be more positive & inclusive, which is why they now attend Pride every year and donate to LGBT+ organizations in honor of the person they killed? A: well then yes, clearly they're an ally. they can come!

Q: Okay, what if they don't like leather strap ons? A: ah, then no...

This sounds like the reading of a contract with a list of arbitrary rules. Every social convention i've seen has also been incredibly arbitrary.

Breaking a social contract doesn't require permanent and total retribution; it usually has a lot of if this then that conventions built right into it. Someone making an off color joke requires a 'hey bro, thats not cool' compared to a neo nazi advocating for the camps to come back at a local government office.

My point is that once the social contract is broken, you aren't breaking it when you call someone else out for doing so.