this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

409 readers
1 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/11304633

Ozempic maker Novo Nordisk facing pressure as study finds $1,000 appetite suppressant can be made for just $5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barti@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I cannot back it with any study but I bet this goes for many medical products that could either be made much cheaper or sold cheaper or both. I’m happy to live in Germany where I pay my medical insurance and they cover the costs for my medicine but I’m thinking about countries like America or others where there I no such coverage of costs because the health care system is lousy. Things like medicine, living, electricity, even mobility like in public transport should be affordable for everyone and if you have to make it free, then countries should do it. Money is right there with the big companies, no need to get it from badly paid workers that keep the entire show running anyway.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 7 months ago

I bet you’re right. The people who have effectively lost half of their income if you factor inflation in are expected to also pay for getting to work, from work, get better if they are sick and I bet even for work clothing.