Privacy

31866 readers

247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

363

Scary AT&T breach leaks up to 70 million Social Security numbers to the dark web (www.macworld.com)

submitted 7 months ago by catculation@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13810367

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The SSA should just set a time limit, (let’s say 3 years,) and then publish a database of every single name, DOB, and SSN. Force the banks to figure out a new system of identification, by making the current system useless.

The current system is already insecure; SSNs were never intended to be secure. So why has the SSA tolerated this for so long? Just make the “in three years we’ll publish this live database for anyone to search” announcement, so banks are forced to develop a better system. It gives them the time to work on a new system, eliminates the need to keep SSNs secret, and the SSA can keep operating as normal.

[–] graymess@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is one of those ideas I'd love to agree with, but I know the reality of the situation would mean negative consequences for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged, just like how current ID systems are now.

[–] Syn_Attck -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Granted: needs an implanted microchip connected via Bluetooth to a phone app to work properly.