this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
247 points (98.8% liked)

News

23320 readers
3000 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Arizona governor, Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, called for an Arizona supreme court ruling to be repealed that permits enforcement of an 1864 law banning almost all abortions. Speaking at a press conference the governor said: 'The near total civil war-era ban that continues to hang over our heads only serves to create more chaos for women and doctors in our state.' First passed when Arizona was still a territory, the ban only permits abortions to save a patient’s life and does not make exceptions for rape or incest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Judges confirming existing laws. Laws must be re-written. Old laws must be banished. Vote Blue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Judges nullify re-written laws all the time, as is the case here.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually no. New law was written but old law was not made defunct. So it must be removed.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So the judiciary nullified a new law because the judiciary hadn't nullified an old law. Sounds like you're making my point for me.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

No, in this case, the 15-week law was specifically designed by the GOP in a purple state NOT to "create a right to an abortion." It was a bullshit law meant to restrict as much as they could before Roe was overturned. Paragraph 24 on page 12:

The legislature included a two-part construction provision in S.B. 1164, expressing its unequivocal intent that, in restricting elective abortion to fifteen weeks’ gestation, it did not create, recognize, or expand a right to an abortion, nor did it repeal § 13-3603’s proscription on elective abortion:

This act does not:

  1. Create or recognize a right to abortion or alter generally accepted medical standards. The Legislature does not intend this act to make lawful an abortion that is currently unlawful.

  2. Repeal, by implication or otherwise, section 13-3603, Arizona Revised Statutes, or any other applicable state law regulating or restricting abortion.

The solution is a state constitutional amendment that should be on the ballot.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

We will be voting on this in November.