Greentext

4141 readers

1730 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

656

Anon finds his people (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MacNCheezus 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You mean gay? Or homosexual?

And why would they censor that and not “fag”, when the former are also used as neutral descriptions while the latter is almost exclusively used in a derogatory way?

And also, do I even have to point out how ridiculous it is to promote freedom of information while simultaneously selectively censoring certain words? That’s literally Russia levels of hypocrisy right there.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No I mean f a g g o t is censored. Which is doubly ironic since fag isn't

[–] MacNCheezus 5 points 5 months ago

Perhaps because it would upset British folks talking about their cigarettes?