this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
306 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
76
What Does The Norwegian Meta Behavioral Ads Ban Really Mean? (www.searchenginejournal.com)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The order on July 14 by the Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposes a country-wide three-month ban on personalized and behavioral ad targeting against Meta, starting August 2023. This means advertisers may see higher costs and lower relevance.

Although Norway is the first country to enact an order like this, there could be others to follow suit. These rulings and bans may set the stage for other forced changes in a world of complex and ever-changing privacy regulations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand. I just wanted to point out that Norway is not some poor country in need of that sum as Norway does very fine on its own.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fines should never be about needing money. But they need to big enough to hurt enough for it not to be “the cost of doing business”.